Judicial Ethics Opinion 16-159 | New York Law Journal – New York News

Judicial Ethics Opinion 16-159 | New York Law Journal – New York News



New York Law Journal




   | 

Choose Existing Folder






Your (Article, Chart, Blog) was successfully saved to your folder My Default Folder

Don’t forget you can visit My Briefcase to manage your folders at any time.


A judge who is dissatisfied with an attorney’s explanation of the propriety of his/her conduct in connection with a proposed default divorce decree must determine, based on the facts and circumstances known to the judge, whether there is a substantial likelihood that the attorney’s actions constitute a substantial violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct and, if so, must take appropriate action. If the judge determines in good faith that he/she is legally permitted and/or legally required to sign the decrees, he/she may do so without violating the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct, assuming he/she can be fair and impartial and is not otherwise disqualified from presiding in matters involving the attorney.


This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

“);
});

click here to read more.

Share this post

Post Comment